Council expenditure on consultants

Reference 787.45
Date Responded
26/01/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
I would like the following information under the Freedom of Information Act:
 
1) The total amount paid out to consultants by the council for the years 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
 
2) Details of the work carried out by consultants.
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email of 22 January 2010, we are now in a position to respond to your enquiry regarding consultants. We have answered each point of your enquiry below:
 
1) The total amount paid out to consultants by the council for the years 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
2006-2007
 
£000
2007-2008
 
£000
2008-2009
 
£000
5,480
3,314
3,341
 
2) Details of the work carried out by consultants.
Please see attached spreadsheet.
 
Attachments Information on consultants

Top of Page

Organisational spend on refuse, ground maintenance and street / gully cleaning

Reference 787.44
Date Responded 15/02/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
I am interested in the total amount your organisation spends on environmental related services (as defined below) on an annual basis. Please could you provide the total spend incurred, both internal and with third parties, for the last three years. In addition please provide a breakdown of all contracts that have been awarded to third parties that are in excess of £150,000.
 
Environmental related services defined as:
  • Refuse and waste related services
  • Grounds maintenance
  • Street and gully cleaning services
For each third party contract, please could you provide me with the name & value of the contract, the start and end dates (including any options to extend and for how long), and to whom the contract was awarded.
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email dated 19th January 2010, in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, we are now in a position to respond.
 
I am interested in the total amount your organisation spends on environmental related services (as defined below) on an annual basis. Please could you provide the total spend incurred, both internal and with third parties, for the last three years. In addition please provide a breakdown of all contracts that have been awarded to third parties that are in excess of £150,000.
 
Environmental related services defined as:
  • Refuse and waste related services
  • Grounds maintenance
  • Street and gully cleaning services  
For each third party contract, please could you provide me with the name & value of the contract, the start and end dates (including any options to extend and for how long), and to whom the contract was awarded.
 
Total Expenditure
 
2006/07
£m
2007/08
£m
2008/09
£m
Refuse and Waste Related Services
 
43.179
44.997
48.797
Grounds Maintenance
 
1.859
1.859
1.859
Gully Emptying (Estimated)
 
1.784
1.883
1.935
 
Contracts over £0.150m:
Name
Value
Dates
Contractor
Waste Recycling Centres
£43m
(over 5 Yrs)
Apr 2008 to Mar 2011
(Option to extend to Mar 2013)
Sita UK Ltd
Green waste composting
£2.7m
(over 4 yrs)
Apr 2008 to Mar 2009
(Option to extend to Mar 2012)
Sita UK Ltd
Green waste composting
£0.3m
(over 4 yrs)
Apr 2008 to Mar 2009
(Option to extend to Mar 2012)
Neales Waste Management
 
It is worth noting that both gully emptying and grounds maintenance are delivered by Lancashire County Council or through joint working with partner District Councils.
  
Attachments None

Top of Page

Suppliers of catering services

Reference 787.72
Date Responded
16/02/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
 Under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 could I please request the following information:
 
1.       A list of the suppliers for the financial year 2008-2009 on catering services (including till systems for canteens) including schools, libraries etc. (any local authority service).
2.       Where possible, the amount of money spent with each of these suppliers during this financial year.
 
Response
 Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email dated 27th January 2010, in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, we are now in a position to respond.
 
SUPPLIER
ANNUAL SPEND
Morris Quality Bakers
£588,215.44
Lathams of Broughton
£36,553.00
Mark Clegg
£51,363.11
Jack Turner
£80,376.00
Ralph Livesey
£2,188,985.80
C&G Neve
£43,436.03
Clifton Quality Meats
£223,143.86
Hopwells
£2,053,215.08
Brakes
2,776,233.02
KQF Ltd
£55,686.36
Dairy Crest
£1,073,201.00
Ashberry
£221,346.81
Brambles
£8,876.00
LCR - Blackpool
£23,875.56
Cunninghams
£22,032.22
   
Attachments None

Top of Page

Pension fund for County Councillors

Reference 787.193
Date Responded
15/03/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
How much does the county council pay into a pension fund for county councillors? That is-how much in a financial year and what by %?
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000

We refer to your email dated 7th March 2010, which has been forwarded onto the Freedom of Information Team to deal with under the provisions of the above Act.

As a percentage and as a total sum, does the County Council pay into a pension fund for County Councillors.

In 2008/9 £87281.53 was paid by Lancashire CC in respect of County Councillors equating to 16.4% of salary. The current employer contribution rate is 17.1%.
 
Attachments
None 

Top of Page

Councillor contributions to pension fund

Reference 787.238
Date Responded
24/03/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
 
Do county councillors pay a contribution to the pension fund and if so what is it in percentage terms and what was the total in the year in question?
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email dated 24th March 2010 in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, we are now in a position to provide you with a response.
 
Do county councillors pay a contribution to the pension fund and if so what is it in percentage terms and what was the total in the year in question?'
 
We can confirm that County Councillors do pay a contribution of 6% of earnings to the Pension Fund. The total contribution paid by County Councillor members in 2008/9 was £31,593.91.
  
Attachments None

Top of Page

Expenditure on suppliers in 2006, 2007 and 2008

Reference 787.192
Date Responded
01/04/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
FOI REQUEST - RELEASE OF INFORMATION RELATING TO EXPENDITURE IN 2006, 07 AND 08
 
I am interested to learn more about the money spent on your main suppliers in the years 2006, 2007, 2008. 

 
Could you please send me details of the expenditure made to each supplier (who supplied goods or services over £500,000 p.a.) in one or more of these years?
 
The ideal format would be Excel in a layout similar to below:
 
Name of Supplier
Type of Goods or Services Supplied
Amount spent in 2006 (£)
Amount spent on 2007 (£)
Amount spent in 2008 (£)
e.g. JM Waste Management Services
e.g. Waste Collection
e.g. £334,098
e.g. £470,111
e.g. £524,079
 
I understand that your financial information may relate to your financial year rather than the calendar year. My request is for the last three years of financial data and need not relate to calendar years. Please do include payments made under PFI arrangements.
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email dated 9th March 2010, in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, we are now in a position to provide you with a response.
 
The money spent on your main suppliers in the years 2006, 2007, 2008. 
Could you please send me details of the expenditure made to each supplier (who supplied goods or services over £500,000 p.a.) in one or more of these years?
 
Please see the attachments to this email which detail the information you have requested.
 
Attachments
2006 (pdf)
 
2007 (pdf)
 
2008 (pdf)
 

Top of Page

Council budget in 2010/11 and 2011/12 for supporting young people

Reference 787.242
Date Responded
16/04/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
Would you please tell me the Council's budgets in 2010/11 and 2011/12 for supporting young people, i.e. Connexions, positive activities, teenage pregnancies, youth taskforce, substance misuse, mental health and youth service? 
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email dated 11th March 2010, in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, we are now in a position to respond.
 
Would you please tell me the Council's budgets in 2010/11 and 2011/12 for supporting young people, i.e. Connexions, positive activities, teenage pregnancies, youth taskforce, substance misuse, mental health and youth service? 
 
CYP Supporting Locality, EI Budget 2010/11      
  Gross Income  Net
  £'000 £'000 £'000
       
CAMHS 493 0 493
TAMHS 150 150 0
  643 150 493
       
       
Care Services Budgets 2010/11      
       
       
CAMHS 1,702 0 1,702
       
       
Substance misuse     585
  
Attachments None

Top of Page

Financial statistics in relation to care homes for the elderly

Reference 787.225
Date Responded
19/04/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
Please can you supply me with the following information under the Freedom of Information Act:

(a) For each of the financial years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10,  what was the total amount of revenue support / subsidy*  allocated directly from the County Council to support the County Council's own homes for the elderly homes (ie excluding any income from fees) for each of those years

(d) During the financial year 2010-11 what is the projected amount of revenue support / subsidy*  on such homes (ie excluding any income from
fees)

(c) What is / will be the total number of bedspaces in the County Council's own homes for the elderly in each of the financial years 2007- 08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11.


* By subsidy I mean the amount paid by the County Council over and above the weekly rate paid by Social Services under the Contract Units banding scheme.
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email dated 23rd March 2010 in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, we are now in a position to provide you with a response.
 
For each of the financial years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, what was the total amount of revenue support / subsidy* allocated directly from the County Council to support the County Council's own homes for the elderly homes (i.e. excluding any income from fees) for each of those years.
 
2007/08:
£316,000,
 
2008/09:
£198,000 and
 
2009/10:
£198,000 respectively

During the financial year 2010-11 what is the projected amount of revenue support / subsidy* on such homes (i.e. excluding any income from fees)
 
No subsidy in 2010/11

 
What is / will be the total number of bed-spaces in the County Council's own homes for the elderly in each of the financial years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11.
 
2007/08:
725,
 
2008/09:
708,
 
2009/10:
708 and
 
2010/11:
708 respectively

* By subsidy I mean the amount paid by the County Council over and above the weekly rate paid by Social Services under the Contract Units banding scheme.
  
Attachments
None 

Top of Page

What LCC's direct services are receiving in terms of gross fee

Reference 787.237
Date Responded
19/04/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
Under the freedom of information act I would like to know exactly what LCC's direct services are receiving in terms of gross fee? what they actually have to achieve financially with that gross fee and what exactly do they receive an additional subsidy for? And how their occupancy levels have been over the last three years in each aspect of their services.

 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email dated 25th March 2010 in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, we are now in a position to provide you with a response.
 
Under the Freedom of Information Act I would like to know exactly what LCC's direct services are receiving in terms of gross fee?
 
This information is already published here 
 
What they actually have to achieve financially with that gross fee and what exactly do they receive an additional subsidy for?
 
We are required to cover all operating costs within the fees received.  In 2010/11 no additional subsidies will be received.
 
And how their occupancy levels have been over the last three years in each aspect of their services.
 
2007/08      87%
2008/09      93%
2009/10      91% 
  
Attachments None

Top of Page

Meetings between anyone representing LCC and various banks plus investments in those banks

Reference 787.237
Date Responded
19/04/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
Under the freedom of information act I would like to know exactly what LCC's direct services are receiving in terms of gross fee? what they actually have to achieve financially with that gross fee and what exactly do they receive an additional subsidy for? And how their occupancy levels have been over the last three years in each aspect of their services.

 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email dated 25th March 2010 in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, we are now in a position to provide you with a response.
 
What they actually have to achieve financially with that gross fee and what exactly do they receive an additional subsidy for?
 
We are required to cover all operating costs within the fees received.  In 2010/11 no additional subsidies will be received.
 
And how their occupancy levels have been over the last three years in each aspect of their services.
 
2007/08      87%
2008/09      93%
2009/10      91% 
  
Attachments None

Top of Page

Spend on mobile phone calls

Reference 787.350
Date Responded
27/05/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
Under the Freedom of Information Act I would like to know how much the council has spent on line rental and calls related to mobile phones provided to staff members in the past financial year (2009/10). I don't need a complete break down of the figures if that would be too time consuming or difficult, but I would like to know how many mobile phones were provided to how many staff members and the amount spent on them during that period
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email dated 10th May 2010, in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, we are now in a position to respond.
 
Spend in 2009/10:
 
Vodaphone           £814,418            (5626 phones – includes councillors)
Orange                  £294,252            (2048 phones)
 
Total                       £1,108,670         (7674 phones)
  
Attachments None

Top of Page

Research on how councils trade with their suppliers

Reference 787.465
Date Responded
12/07/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
We are currently conducting research into how councils trade with their suppliers. Accordingly, could you please provide the following information regarding the way your Council trades with its suppliers?
 
1.    How many suppliers does your council receive invoices from over the course of a year?
 
2.    What percentage of your council's suppliers submit their invoices electronically for automatic loading onto your ledger (i.e. by EDI)?
(This means only invoices that are never handled by a person or rekeyed in any way.)
 
3.    How many invoices in total does your council receive and process from suppliers per annum?
 
4.    What percentage of these invoices are automatically loaded onto your ledger without the need for rekeying (i.e. received via EDI)?
 
5.    What is the value of all invoices processed for payment each year?
 
6.    What percentage of invoices are cleared for payment without query?
 
7.    How many hours do staff at your council spend processing invoices each month (this includes time spent opening, rekeying, resolving queries and approving invoices for payment)?
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email dated 23rd June 2010, in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, we are now in a position to respond.
 
It is not yet possible using our systems in place to easily differentiate between true procurement spend/invoices and other payments. The information contained within the reports requested for your request therefore contains both procurement spend/invoices and other payments. The other payments can consist of: Grant payments; Direct payments to individuals; Payments to foster carers; Lump sum retirement payments; Equal pay settlements. This list is not exhaustive. Payments also include purchases made by Lancashire schools.
 
1.    How many suppliers does your council receive invoices from over the course of a year?
In Financial Year 2009/10 there were 37,378 suppliers/payees with invoices/payments.
 
2.    What percentage of your council's suppliers submit their invoices electronically for automatic loading onto your ledger (i.e. by EDI)? (This means only invoices that are never handled by a person or rekeyed in any way.)
80 suppliers provided EDI invoices. Therefore 80/37,378 = 0.2% of suppliers.
 
3.    How many invoices in total does your council receive and process from suppliers per annum?
In Financial Year 2009/10 a total of 773,642 invoices/payments were processed.
 
4.    What percentage of these invoices are automatically loaded onto your ledger without the need for rekeying (i.e. received via EDI)?
 93,412 invoices. Therefore 93,412/773,642 =12%
 
5.    What is the value of all invoices processed for payment each year?
The value of the processed invoices/payments in Financial Year 2009/10 was £1,772,348,678.
 
6.    What percentage of invoices are cleared for payment without query?
Not currently measured.
 
7.    How many hours do staff at your council spend processing invoices each month (this includes time spent opening, rekeying, resolving queries and approving invoices for payment)?
Centrally: 666 hours per week (2664 – 3330hrs per month), this excludes any local processing activity which may occur.
 
Attachments None

Top of Page

Amount the Council spends with Capita PLC

Reference 787.434
Date Responded
19/07/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
I am researching the growth of the Company Capita PLC.  Could you advise me of the amount the Council spends with this Company and to which Department that amount relates to? (Period 2008/2009 and 2009/2010)
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email dated 10th June 2010, in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, we are now in a position to respond.
 
Could you advise me of the amount the Council spends with this Company and to which Department that amount relates to? (Period 2008/2009 and 2009/2010)

Please find the attached document in response to your request.  

Attachments Capital PLC spend (excel)

Top of Page

Recovery of accidental overpayments and duplication payments

Reference 787.429
Date Responded
11/08/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
My request concerns the identification and recovery of accidental overpayments and duplicate payments to creditors in the council’s accounts payable system.
  1. When did Lancashire County Council last submit data to the Audit Commission for data matching under the NFI and what years did they cover?
  2. What was the value of duplicate and overpayments to creditors identified and recovered as a result of that data matching exercise?
  3. Has Lancashire County Council engaged third party profit recovery agencies or undertaken any other internal audit for recovering overpayments and duplicate payments to its creditors over the last two years?
If the answer to 3 is yes, what years' data were covered and what was the value of overpayments and duplicate payments to creditors identified and recovered?
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email, we are now in a position to respond to your enquiry regarding the submission of 'data to the Audit Commission for data matching under the NFI'. Firstly, please let me apologise for the length of time it has taken to respond to your request.
 
We have answered each point of your enquiry below:
 
1. When did Lancashire County Council last submit data to the Audit Commission for data matching under the NFI and what years did they cover?
It is a statutory requirement for Lancashire County Council to participate in the Audit Commission's National Fraud Initiative which is run every two years. The last data was submitted to the Audit Commission in October 2008 and covered data from October 2006 to October 2008. The data will be submitted again in October 2010 and will cover the period October 2008 to October 2010.
 
2. What was the value of duplicate and overpayments to creditors identified and recovered as a result of that data matching exercise?
The NFI exercise did not identify any duplicate payments that had not already been identified by the duplicate payment finder software detailed in 3 below.
 
3. Has Lancashire County Council engaged third party profit recovery agencies or undertaken any other internal audit for recovering overpayments and duplicate payments to its creditors over the last two years?
The county council operates duplicate payment finder software throughout the year and takes the necessary action to stop any potential duplicate payments. The controls surrounding duplicate payments are reviewed and reported on by internal audit on an annual basis. Any overpayments are followed up using the most cost effective method of recovery and as part of this process debts are referred to a third party recovery
agency at an appropriate stage.
 
4. If the answer to 3 is yes, what years' data were covered and what was the value of overpayments and duplicate payments to creditors identified and recovered?
Internal audit for 2008/09 identified a possible 22 duplicate payments to the value of £191,822.36. These were investigated and appropriate action undertaken. One overpayment is partially outstanding for £33,379.42 this has been logged with the insolvency Practioner handling this matter. The overpayments referred to the third party debt recovery agency in the last two years related to 11 overpayments with a value of £1,975.97 of which £1,242.74 is outstanding as at 09/08/2010.
  
Attachments None

Top of Page

Use of purchasing cards

Reference 787.648
Date Responded 07/09/2010
Response Type
Full disclosure
Request
If the Lancashire County Council has a purchasing card programme, please could you answer the following queries:
 
1.     Which bank provides your purchasing card scheme?
2.     What was the total amount of spend placed through the scheme last financial year (1st April 2009 – 31st March 2010)?
3.     When does your contract for the supply of purchasing cards expire?
4.     Does the contract have a break clause?
 
If the organisation does not have a purchasing card programme, please could you confirm this is the case. If the organisation has more than one programme could you provide answers for all the programmes that are currently running in the organisation.
 
For the avoidance of doubt, purchasing cards are bank cards issued to employees to allow them to purchase goods and services using the organisation’s own funds. They are frequently used for expenses and travel, but can be used for a wide variety of purchasing activities.
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email of 25 August 2010, we are now in a position to respond to your enquiry regarding purchasing cards. We have answered each point of your enquiry below.
 
1.       Which bank provides your purchasing card scheme?
Barclaycard Commercial
 
2.       What was the total amount of spend placed through the scheme last financial year (1st April 2009 – 31st March 2010)?
£2.37million
 
3.       When does your contract for the supply of purchasing cards expire?
31 January 2013
 
4.       Does the contract have a break clause?
No.
 
Attachments
None

Top of Page

Monies received for the Connexions career service

Reference 787.647
Date Responded 10/09/2010
Response Type
Full disclosure
Request
In the last financial year (2009/10):
 
(a) how much money did your local authority receive from central Government for the Connexions careers service?
(b) how much money did your authority spend on the Connexions careers service?
(c) how many interventions did the Connexions careers service make in your local authority? and how many of these were (i) one-to-one personal contact, (ii) telephone calls, (iii) any other means?
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email of 31 August, in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, we are now in a position to respond.
 
(a) how much money did your local authority receive from central Government for the Connexions careers service?
 
In 2009/10 LCC received £9,693k Connexions Area Based Grant from the government
 
(b) how much money did your authority spend on the Connexions careers service?
 
This entire amount was allocated to deliver connexions activities in Lancashire
 
(c) how many interventions did the Connexions careers service make in your local authority? and how many of these were (i) one-to-one personal contact, (ii) telephone calls, (iii) any other means?

Please see the attachment

Attachments

Top of Page

Breakdown of expenditure on Preston Tithebarn Development

Reference 787.682
Date Responded 29/09/2010
Response Type
Full disclosure
Request
Please confirm the total amount the county council has spent to date on Preston's Tithebarn redevelopment plans.
 
Please provide a breakdown of the figure, including the cost of any studies commissioned, legal advice, counsel fees etc.
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email of 8 September 2010, we are now in a position to respond to your enquiry regarding the Tithebarn redevelopment plans. We have answered your enquiry below.
  • Retail Consultants: £148,000 (of which £28,000 related to assessing the retail element of the Tithebarn planning application and other pre-inquiry work)
  • Counsel: £87,000
  • Highway/Transport support (during the planning application stage): £4900
  • Total: 239,900
Attachments
None

Top of Page

Breakdown of expenditure on Mid Pennine Reach Project

Reference 787.683
Date Responded 06/10/2010
Response Type
Full disclosure
Request
Please confirm the total amount of money spent by the council so far on the Pennine Reach scheme.
Please also provide a breakdown of what the costs relate to.
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email of 8th September 2010, we are now in a position to respond to your enquiry regarding the Pennine Reach Scheme. We have answered your enquiry below.
 
Year
Spend
Reason
2006/07
£65,000
Initial development of scheme
2007/08
£65,000
Development Rapid Transit Scheme.
2008/09
£209,530
Development of Major Scheme Bid
Joint scheme consultation with Blackburn with Darwen Council
Lancashire specific consultation
2009/10
£201,733
Development of Major Scheme Bid
Joint scheme consultation
 
The above figures represent Lancashire County Council's contribution to the scheme, with Blackburn with Darwen Council being the other key partner.
 
In addition, the table below shows the costs incurred in developing the proposal for a new Accrington Bus Station. This is part of the Pennine Reach Scheme but developed independently.
 
Accrington Bus Station
 
Year
Spend
Reason
2003/04
£2150
Scheme development
2004/05
£1575
Scheme development
2005/06
£3725
Scheme development
2006/07
£7192
Scheme development
2007/08
£4644.50
Scheme development
2008/09
£74,593.95
Scheme development, surveys and planning enquiry
2009/10
£27,555.85
Surveys and planning application
 
Total:  £121,436.63
 
Attachments
None

Top of Page

Amount spent on retrieving debts

Reference 787.725
Date Responded 18/10/2010
Response Type
Full disclosure
Request
  1. How much has the council spent on retrieving outstanding debts in the year 2009-10?
  2. How much were these outstanding debts? 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email dated 28th September 2010, in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, we are now in a position to respond.
  1. How much has the council spent on retrieving outstanding debts in the year 2009-10?
  2. How much were these outstanding debts?
Cost of recovery team is £267,000. This includes all costs, direct and indirect (i.e. includes IT, salaries, accommodation etc).
In 2009-10 we raised 34,280 invoices totalling £192.1m.
 
Attachments
None

Top of Page

Money spent on producing and distributing newspapers and spend on PR / communication staff

Reference 787.468
Date Responded
25/10/2010
Response Type
Full Disclosure
Request
This is a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Please provide details of the following for the last three years with a breakdown for each year:
 
a) how much money has been spent on producing and distributing council newspapers
 
b) how much money is spent per year on PR and communications staff.
 
c) how much is paid to the highest paid member of PR/communications staff - there is no need to disclose names and therefore this is not covered by the Data Protection Act.
 
Response
Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Further to your email, dated 24 June, in which you request the disclosure of information under the provisions of the above Act, I am now in a position to respond.  Please accept my apologies for the delay in responding.
 
Expenditure on producing and distributing the council newspaper
 
The total cost of the production and distribution of the Lancashire County Council newspaper for residents, including planned expenditure for 2010-11, is shown below.
 
Year
Total spend (or planned spend)
on production and distribution
2008-09
£186,740
2009-10
£629,563
2010-11
£63,600
 
The disparity between different years reflects changes in the frequency of the newspaper's production.  In 2009/10 the frequency of the newspaper peaked when it was produced on a monthly basis.  In 2010/11, frequency has been reduced to two editions per year, hence a year-on-year saving of £565,962 or approximately 90%.
 
Please note the county council serves a considerably larger area than most local authorities, with each edition having a circulation of approximately 500,000.
 
Expenditure on 'PR and communications' staff
 
We have applied a broad definition of 'PR and communications' to include staff responsible for all of the following:
·         Strategic and corporate communications
·         Media relations/press office
·         Internal communications
·         Marketing and communications campaigns
·         Websites and social media
 
All of these functions have been subject to a county council-wide review over the last 18 months culminating in the introduction of a newly centralised Communications Service in August 2010.
 
The salary costs for the 32 staff under the new model are £973,782 per annum.  The total for salary costs plus National Insurance contributions and 'on costs' is £1,270,840 per annum out of a total county council spend of £1,849,000,000.
 
These figures reflect current pro rata costs but will take full effect in 2011-12 as this will be the first full year of operating with the new model.  The equivalent total figure for a full year under the previous model, based on 2009-10 figures, was £1,649,114.
 
Therefore there will be a 23% saving on these posts in 2011-12 compared to 2009-10.
 
Highest paid PR and communications staff member
 
The Head of Communications is paid at Grade HS2 with a salary range of £63,408 - £69,793.
 
Attachments None

Top of Page

Money owed to Community Alliance (Burnley and Padiham) Ltd

Reference 787.688
Date Responded 05/11/2010
Response Type
Full disclosure
Request

I would like to request information that Lancashire County Council has regarding money owed to it by the Community Alliance (Burnley and Padiham) Ltd, with particular regard to the mortgage on Healey Wood School, Springhill Road, Burnley, BB11 2LP and Pension Strain debts, plus any other monies owed by the Community Alliance to Lancashire County Council, and what measures have been taken to recover these debts.

Response
Further to your email dated 10 September 2010 we are now in a position to respond.
 
Information that Lancashire County Council has regarding money owed to it by the Community Alliance (Burnley and Padiham) Ltd; with particular regard to the following:
  • Mortgage on Healy Wood School
The money owed to Lancashire County Council in respect of the unpaid mortgage is £50,400, plus interest of £3875.06
  • Pension Strain debts
The money owed to Lancashire County Council in respect of the unpaid pension strain contributions is £70,954.75
  • Any other monies owed by the Community Alliance to LCC
The Community Alliance also owe Lancashire County Council £15,000 in respect of a Climate Change Grant
 
Please provide details of what measures have been taken to recover the debts.

An Insolvency Practitioner has been appointed to manage the liabilities of Community Alliance and it is understood that a joint appointment of Liquidators is due to take place imminently.  The County Council is liaising with the Insolvency Practitioner regarding the outstanding sums owing to it by Community Alliance.  A list of the Alliance's creditors is currently being compiled by the Insolvency Practitioner and a meeting of creditors is due to take place once that list is finalised. 

Attachments
None

Top of Page